Strategies, alliances and business portfolio to develop melon competitiveness in the Comarca Lagunera, Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v9i19.990Keywords:
focus group, competitiveness, alliances, business portfolioAbstract
The Lagunera Region stands out as the most important melon area in Mexico with an annual area of around 5,000 hectares and a production of 134,000 tons. Production in this region is threatened by imports, pests, diseases, marketing problems, high production costs, lack of financing and increased quality requirements by the self-service stores. The objective of this work was to propose a series of strategies, alliances and business portfolio to improve the competitiveness of the melon production chain in the Comarca Lagunera, Mexico to avoid being displaced by competing regions of the country and abroad.
Method: In this work we used the methodology known as "Focus Group". There were 27 participants, of whom 18 were producers of melon, five technicians, two officials from the Ministry of Rural Development of the state government of Coahuila and two representatives of companies supplying agricultural inputs. Two days in several dynamics based on previously elaborated formats. The obtained information was classified having obtained the competitive forces, the strategies, the alliances and the portfolio of businesses.
Results: Six strategies were identified for the development of competitiveness, their scope, limitations and the estimated time to be carried out. The strategies were: 1) technical training aimed at obtaining certification in food safety, 2) transfer of the technological package, 3) management of resources to finance and ensure production, 4) direct sale of melon to the retail self-service stores, 5) establish alliances with academic and research institutions and 6) establish alliances with state and federal agencies of the Agricultural Sector. As for the alliances are specific to each strategy, highlighting those with federal and state agencies, Universities and research centers of the agricultural sector; institutions of financing and assurance to the field and chains of stores of self-service. Finally, in the business portfolio it is proposed the creation of 1) a melon marketing management office, 2) a credit union, 3) a professional services rendering agency, and 4) a marketing agency for equipment and supplies.
Conclusion: The results allowed to define the main strategies, pacts to be realized and the portfolio of businesses tending to develop the productivity and competitiveness of the melon in the Comarca Lagunera de Coahuila. These results were presented and validated in a meeting of the melon product system of the Comarca Lagunera; however, its implementation will depend on the producers being able to organize and carry out the actions proposed here.Downloads
References
Avendaño R.B. y R. Schwentesius. 2004. Factores de competitividad en la producción y expor-tación de hortalizas: el caso del Valle de Mexicali, B.C. México. Problemas del Desarrollo, 36(140):165-192. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/prode/v36n140/v36n140a8.pdf
Avendaño R.B., R. Schwentesius y S. Lugo. 2006. El impacto de la iniciativa de inocuidad ali-mentaria de Estados Unidos en las exportaciones de hortalizas frescas del noroeste de México. Región y Desarrollo, XVIII(36):7-36. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/regsoc/v18n36/v18n36a1.pdf
Bielschowsky, R. (1998). Evolución de las ideas de la CEPAL. Revista de la CEPAL. Cincuen-ta Años número extraordinario. Brasilia, Brasil. Pp: 21-45. Recuperado de: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/12121
Calva, J.(2007). Educación, Ciencia, Tecnología y Competitividad, Agenda para el Desarrollo. Vol. 10. 1ª Edición. Coedición: Ed.Porrúa, Ed. UNAM y H. Cámara de Diputados, LX Legisla-tura. México, D.F. Disponible en: https://books.google.com.mx/books?hl=es&lr=&id=0QIadte8Yg8C&oi=fnd&pg=PA11&dq=jos%C3%A9+Luis+calva+2007&ots=OecZJEQqno&sig=IO22d_JI6HWGPneIgyxu8jw-o6U#v=onepage&q=jos%C3%A9%20Luis%20calva%202007&f=false
Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). 2002. Import Requirements for Mexican Cantalou-pes. November 4, 2002. Recuperado de: www.inspection.gc.ca//english/plaveg/fresh/mexcane.html
Carro, P.R, y D. González. (s.f.). Productividad y competitividad. Apunte de estudio. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales. Universidad Nacional de Mar de la Plata. Buenos Aires, Argentina. Recuperado de: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11677322.pdf
CEPAL. (2010). Un índice regional de Competitividad para un país. Revista CEPAL, No. 102. CEPAL. Santiago de Chile. Recuperado de: http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/11417/102069086_es.pdf
Coronado, F., V. Charles and R. Dwyer. 2017. Measuring regional competitiveness through agricultural índices of productivity: The Peruvian case. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Ma-nagement and Sustainable Development, 13(2): 78-95. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-06-2016-0031
Espinoza, A. J.J., M. Lozada y S. Leyva. 2011. Posibilidades y restricciones para la exportación de melón cantaloupe producido en el municipio de Mapimí, Dgo., México al mercado de los Estados Unidos. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios, 15(28): 593-604.
Fernqvist, F., S. Spendrum and L. Ekelund. 2015. Change consumer intake of potatoes, a focus group study. British Food Journal, 17(1): 210-221. Recuperado de: http://www.emeraldinsight.com.proxy.infosal.uadec.mx/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/BFJ-05-2013-0112
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2002. Import Alert # 22-01: Detention Without Physi-cal Examination of Cantaloupes from Mexico. Recuperado de: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_67.html
Huo, Da. 2014. Impact of country-level factors on exportcompetitiveness of agricultur e indus-try from emerging markets. Competitiveness Review, 24(5):393-413. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CR-01-2012-0002
Kitzinger, J. 1995. Introducingfocusgroups. BMJ Journal; 31: 299-302. Recuperado de: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2550365/
Malakauskaite, A. and V. Navickas. (2011). Contribution of Clusters to the Competitiveness of Companies: Revelation and Evaluation. Engineering Economics, 22(1): 50-57
Morgan, D.L. 1998. The focus group Guidebook. Sagepublications, Inc. London. ISBN: 0-7619-0818-8. Recuperado de: https://books.google.com.mx/books?hl=es&lr=&id=nrLdCQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=focus+gropup&ots=uth3NvKcD-&sig=QQpihcPaLXfp-HHcF3jEXtUSHLI#v=onepage&q=focus%20gropup&f=false
Niels, K., R. Artavia, R. Arce and V. Umaña. 2015. The Central American Competitiveness Initiative. Competitiveness Review, 25(5):555-570. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CR-07-2015-0065
Porter, M.E. 1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, New York, NY.
Porter, M.E. (1998). Clusters and the new Economics of competiticon. Harvard Business Re-view, 76 (6), 77-90. Boston, MA.
Porter, M.E. 2008. Las cinco fuerzas competitivas que le dan forma a la estrategia. Harvard Bu-siness Review, América Latina. Harvard Business School Publishing corporation. 15 p.
Rojas, P., Chavarría, H., Romero, S. y Sepúlveda, S. (2000). Los Complejos Productivos: de la Teoría a la Práctica. (Cuaderno Técnico No. 15). IICA. Costa Rica. Recuperado de: http://repiica.iica.int/DOCS/B0244E/B0244E.PDF
SIAP-SAGARPA. (2016). Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. México, D.F. Sitio Web: http://www.gob.mx/siap/
Xuedong, D. (2006). Innovation and technology transfer in Chinesse agricultura. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(2):241-247. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14626000610665944
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Nova Scientia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Conditions for the freedom of publication: the journal, due to its scientific nature, must not have political or institutional undertones to groups that are foreign to the original objective of the same, or its mission, so that there is no censorship derived from the rigorous ruling process.
Due to this, the contents of the articles will be the responsibility of the authors, and once published, the considerations made to the same will be sent to the authors so that they resolve any possible controversies regarding their work.
The complete or partial reproduction of the work is authorized as long as the source is cited.