Oligopsony-Oligopoly The perfect imperfect competition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v6i11.87Keywords:
Oligopsony, oligopoly, imperfect competitionAbstract
Oligopoly and oligopsony have been studied extensively. However, the dual figure of the oligopsonistic-oligopolistic intermediary has not been. This dual personality has a double negative impact on the market, on one hand reduces the demand to producers who face a competitive market, lowering prices as buyers, and on the other hand reducing its offer by raising the prices as sellers. In this way, their benefits are increased buying cheap and selling expensive, affecting effective demand of the consumer and the effective supply of the initial producer.Downloads
References
Chamberlin, Edward Hastings (1934), Teoría de la Competencia Monopólica, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Segunda Edición en Español, 1956, México.
Encinas Ferrer, Carlos (2003), Teoría Económica, Sistema Avanzado de Bachillerato y Educación Superior (SABES), segunda edición 2004. México.
- Monopsonio-Monopolio. La perfecta competencia imperfecta. Article provided by Grupo Eumed.net (Universidad de Málaga) in its journal TECSISTECATL.Volume (Year): (2010), Issue (Month): 9 (December), EUMED.
Hall, R.L. y C. J. Hitch, Price Theory and Business Behaviour, en «Oxford Economic Papers», 1939, reprinted by Oxford Studies in the Price Mecanism, T. Wilson y P. W. S. Andrews, Oxford 1951, pp. 106-38.
Hoffman, A.C. (1940), Large Scale Organization in the Food Industries, Monograph No. 35, US Temporary National Economic Committee, Washington, D.C.
Keynes, John Maynard (1936), Teoría General de la Ocupación el Interés y el Dinero, Fondo de Cultura Económica, sexta edición, 1963. México.
Krugman, Paul and Robin Wells (2006), Introducción a la Economía, Microeconomía, Editorial Reverte, Barcelona.
Lipsey, Richard G. (1989), Introduction to Positive Economics, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 7th. Ed., p 223. London.
Mankiw, N. Gregory (2009), Principles of Economics, Cengage Learning, 5th Edición, USA.
Monopsonistic Competition, Amos WEB Encyclonomic WEB*pedia, http://www.AmosWEB.com, AmosWEB LLC, 2000-2013. [Accessed: April 5, 2013].
Martinás, Katalin (2002), “Is the Utility Maximization Principle Necessary?”,Post-autistic economics review, Issue no. 12; 15 March 2002. http://www.paecon.net/PAE Review/wholeissues/issue12.htm. Acceed: November 29, 2010.
Robinson, Joan Violet (1933), The Economics of Imperfect Competition, Macmillan. 2d ed., 1969.Londres.
John Rust, George Hall, "Middlemen versus Market Makers: A Theory of Competitive Exchange", NBER Working Paper No. 8883, Issued in April 2002, NBER Program(s): IO. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8883
Say, Jean Baptiste: A treatise on political economy; or the production distribution and consumption of wealth. Translated from the fourth edition of the French. Batoche Books Kitchener 2001, p. 57 Say’s law, in honor of Juan Bautista Say, who said at the end of the eighteenth century that any offer, created its own demand, so the mismatch between supply and demand is quickly corrected.
Sylos Labini, Paolo, Oligopolio y progreso técnico, Barcelona, Oikos-Tau, 1965.
Smith, Adam (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Edwin Cannan (Editor), Randim House, Inc. Nueva York, 1904.
Sraffa, Piero (1926), “The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 36, No.144 (Dec. 1926), pp. 535 – 550, Blackwell Publishing, Royal Economic Society, UK.
Sweezy, Paul M., Demand Under Conditions of Oligopoly, en «Journal of Political Economy», 1939, reimpreso en Readings in Price Theory, Allen and Unwin, Londres 1953, pp. 404-9.
Williams, Michael Francis (2009), "Analysis of Monopsony", Cooleconomics.com. Consulted November 18, 2013. http://getyourecon.com/mana/mana-monopsony.pdf
Zamora, Ricardo (1959), Tratado de Teoría Económica, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 4th. Edition, Mexico.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Nova Scientia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Conditions for the freedom of publication: the journal, due to its scientific nature, must not have political or institutional undertones to groups that are foreign to the original objective of the same, or its mission, so that there is no censorship derived from the rigorous ruling process.
Due to this, the contents of the articles will be the responsibility of the authors, and once published, the considerations made to the same will be sent to the authors so that they resolve any possible controversies regarding their work.
The complete or partial reproduction of the work is authorized as long as the source is cited.