Is experience the only way to improve public speaking in science?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v7i14.75Keywords:
Oral presentation, scientific communication, public speech anxiety, stage fright, transparency illusionAbstract
Introduction: Any science practitioner is constantly exposed to public speaking (PS) situations: conferences, congresses, symposia, workshops, etc.; thus it is essential to communicate our ideas in a clear and convincing manner during an oral presentation. Professionals and students alike, often assume that the skills for PS are achieved and developed only by practicing. However, in PS situations it is common that experienced professionals deliver deficient oral presentations. The hypothesis of this study is that experience by itself is not the only way to acquire such skills, but it is possible to improve the presentation skills of a group of science students by learning the scientific rationale of PS.
Method: We applied a public speaking performance test (Rapee test) to a group of 15 postgraduate students of marine sciences, after a brief presentation, before and after taking a course on PS. During the course we examined the science underlying the PS, PS protocols in science and the application of graphic design principles into visual supporting material of oral presentations. The results of the Rapee test applied before and after the course were compared using a test for difference between means of independent samples (p value of 0.05).
Results: The groups’ average grade before the course indicated a low performance (48 points out of 68). After taking the course of PS, this average grade significantly increased (from 48 to 57 points), which allows to not reject the hypothesis. Discussion or
Conclusion: These results suggest that the students, regardless their previous experience, can improve their PS performance and develop efficient oral presentations if they are properly instructed with the basic scientific principles of the PS. If a constant practice is also considered, the result will likely be an evident control of PS situations, At least within the scientific community, there are too few individuals that have developed skills for PS, that for the vast majority it is recommendable to receive an appropriate instruction of the scientific rationale behind the PS
Downloads
References
Amogne, D. e Yigzaw A. (2013). Oral communication apprehension, competence and per-formance among maritime engineering trainees. Journal of Media and Communication Studies 5(1): 5-11.
Andeweg, B., de Jong, J. y Hoeken, H. (1998). May I have your attention? Exordial tech-niques in informative oral presentations. Technical Communication Quarterly 7(3): 271–284.
Aviezer, H., Trope, Y., y Todorov, A. (2012). Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science 338: 1225-1229.
Beidel, D. C., Turner, S. M., Jacob, R. G., y Cooley, M. R. (1989). Assessment of social pho-bia: Reliability of an impromptu speech task. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 3: 149-158.
Berk, R. A. (2011). Research on PowerPoint®: From basic features to multimedia. Interna-tional Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning 7(1): 24-35.
Bodie, G. D. y Fitch-Hauser, M. (2010). Quantitative research in listening: Explication and overview. En Listening and human communication in the 21st century por Andrew, D. Wol-vin, 46-93. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bousmalis, K., Zafeiriou, S., Morencey, L. P. y Pantic, M. (2013). Infinite Hidden Condition-al Random Fields for human behavior analysis. IEEE Transactions Neural Networks and Learning Systems 24(1): 170-177.
Brown, M. A. y Stopa, L. (2008). The looming maladaptive style in social anxiety. Behavior Therapy 39(1): 57-64.
Carter, M. (2013). Designing Science Presentations. A visual guide to figures, papers, slides, posters and more. London: Academic Press, 360 pp.
Clark, D. (2001). A Cognitive Perspective on Social Phobia. En International Handbook of Social Anxiety: Concepts, Research and Interventions Relating to the Self and Shyness por W. Ray Crozier y Lynn E. Alden 405-430. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Clark, T. y Greatbatch, D. (2011). Audience perceptions of charismatic and non-charismatic oratory: The case of management gurus. The Leadership Quarterly 22(1): 22–32.
Cunningham, V. Lefkoe, M. y Sechrest, L. (2006). Eliminating fears: An intervention that permanently eliminates the fear of public speaking. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 13: 183-193.
Crosling G, y Ward I. (2002). Oral communication: The workplace needs and uses of business graduate employees. English for Specific Purposes 21(1): 41-57.
D’Arcy, J (1998) Technically Speaking: a guide for communicating complex information. Columbus: Battelle Press, 160 pp.
De Grez, L. y Valcke, M. (2013). Student response system and how to make engineering stu-dents learn oral presentation skills. International Journal of Engineering Education 29 (4): 940-947.
Gaskins, R. (2007). PowerPoint at 20: Back to Basics. Communications of the ACM 50(12): 15-17.
Gillath, O., Bahns, A. Ge, F. y Crandall, C. (2012). Shoes as a source of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality 46(4): 423-430.
Griffin, C. L. (2012). Invitation to Public Speaking, 4th edition, Cengage, USA: Wadsworth.
Gross-Davis, B. (1992). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series.
Goberman, A. M., Hughes, S. y Haydock, T. (2011). Acoustic characteristics of public speak-ing anxiety and practice effects. Speech Communication 53(6): 867–876.
Hayne, A. N., y McDaniel, G. S. (2013). Presentation Rubric: Improving Faculty Professional Presentations. Nursing forum 23(4): 289-294.
Heeren, A., Ceschi, G., Valentiner, D. P., Dethier, V. y Philippot, P. (2013). Assessing public speaking fear with the short form of the Personal Report of Confidence as a Speaker scale: confirmatory factor analyses among a French-speaking community sample. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 9: 609–618.
Ihmeideh, F. M., Al-Omari, A. A., y Al-Dababneh, K. A. (2010). Attitudes toward Communi-cation Skills among Students’-Teachers’ in Jordanian Public Universities. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 35(4): 1-10.
Johnson, B., y Christensen, L. (2010). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Fourth edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Katt, J., Murdock, J., Butler, J., y Pryor, B. (2008). Establishing best practices for the use of PowerPointTM as a presentation aid. Human Communication 11(1) 193-200.
Lapakko, D. (2007). Communication is 93% nonverbal: An urban legend proliferates. Com-munication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal 34: 7-19.
Maerivoet, S. y de Moor, B. (2005). Graduate Students and the Art of Public Speaking. ESAT-SCD (SISTA) / TR 04-206. Disponible en línea: ftp://ftp.esat.kuleuven.be/sista/smaerivo/reports/paper-04-206.pdf.
Marzuki, E., Su-Hie, T., Collin, J., Kee-Man, C., Jecky, M. (2013). Congruence between lan-guage proficiency and communicative abilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 97: 448-453.
Maupin, R. J., y May, C. A. (1993). Communication for accounting students. International Journal of Educational Management 7(3): 30-38.
May, G. S. y May C. B. 1989. Communication instruction: What is being done to develop the communication skills of accounting students? Journal of Accounting Education 7(2): 233-244.
McCroskey, J. C. (2008). Communication apprehension: What have we learned in the last fourth decades? Human Communication. 12(2):157-171.
McCroskey, J. C. (1997). An introduction to rhetorical communication, 7th ed., Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
McCroskey, J. C. y Beatty, M. J. (1986). Oral communication apprehension. En: Shyness: Perspectives on research and treatment por Warren H. Jones, Jonathan M. Cheek, Stephen R. Briggs, 279-293. New York: Plenum Press.
Moscovitch, D. A. y Hofmann, S. G. (2006). When ambiguity hurts: Social standards moder-ate self-appraisals in generalized social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45(5): 1039-1052.
Orr, E.; Moscovitch, D. A. 2010. Learning to re-appraise the self during video feedback for social anxiety: Does depth of processing matter? Behaviour Research and Therapy 48(8): 728-737.
Rapee, R. M. y Lim, L. (1992). Discrepancy between self and observer rating of performance in social phobics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 101(4): 727-731.
Roth, D. A. y Heimberg, R. G. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral models of social anxiety disor-der. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 24(4): 753-771.
Savitsky, K. y Gilovich, T. (2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 39(6) 618–625.
Sokal, R. R. y Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry, New York: Freeman, 887 pp.
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd ed., Cheshire, Con-necticut, Graphics Press, 197 pp.
Velásquez-Henao, J. D. (2012). Principios básicos de diseño gráfico aplicados a la preparación de ayudas visuales para presentaciones científicas y de negocios. Estudios Gerenciales 28(123): 167-189.
Waljee, J. F., Larson, B. P. Chang, K., Ono, S., Holland, A. L., Haase, S. C. y Chung, K. C. (2012). Developing the Art of Scientific Presentation. Journal of Hand Surgery 37(2): 2580-2588.
Warnecke, E. 2014. The art of communication. Australian Family Physician. 43(3): 156-158.
Wiseman, R., Watt, C., ten Brinke, L., Porter, S., Couper, S. L. y Rankin, C. (2012). The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming. PlosONE 7: e40259.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Nova Scientia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Conditions for the freedom of publication: the journal, due to its scientific nature, must not have political or institutional undertones to groups that are foreign to the original objective of the same, or its mission, so that there is no censorship derived from the rigorous ruling process.
Due to this, the contents of the articles will be the responsibility of the authors, and once published, the considerations made to the same will be sent to the authors so that they resolve any possible controversies regarding their work.
The complete or partial reproduction of the work is authorized as long as the source is cited.
