Anatomical compatibility of Jatropha curcas (L.) graft on Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Muell.Arg rootstock
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v8i17.642Keywords:
Grafting, Rootstocks, Jatropha curcas, Jatropha cinereaAbstract
Graft compatibility of Jatropha curcas on Jatropha cinerea was confirmed by obtaining a high survival (95%) of the total grafted plants. Their regeneration and development was accomplished by histological assays observing compatibility of the vessel tissues. At anatomical level, both species had the same cell types (parenchyma in the external cortex, specific cells forming phloem tissues, vascular and xylem cambium) completely differentiated at the moment of grafting. When comparing different tissues, the parenchyma cells of J. curcas had fewer amounts of starch grains than those of J. cinerea. Another anatomical difference was vascular cambium amplitude, which was greater in J. cinerea than in J. curcas. The results of the histological cuts in the grafted stems showed integration of J. curcas tissue with J. cinerea stock when they developed as one plant only.
Downloads
References
Baraona, M. and Sancho, E. (2000). Fruticultura General (Fruticultura I). EUNED. Segunda edición. San José, Costa Rica. 164 p.
Budi, S. B., Budianto, A. and Muliarta, A. I. (2012). Seed viability of Jatropha curcas in dif-ferent fruit maturity stages after storage. Bioscience. 4 (3):113-117.
Cholid, M., Djumali, Hariyadi, S. Susanto, B. S., and Purwoko. (2014). Effects of Grafting Time and Grafting Methods Used on Scion and Rootstock Compatibility of Phisyc Nut (Jatropha curcas L.). Asian Journal of Agricultural Research. 8 (3): 150-163.
Colla, G., Rouphaelb, Y., Leonardic, C. and Bied, Z. (2010). Role of grafting in vegetable crops grown under saline conditions. Scientia Horticulturae. 127. 147-155.
D’ Ambrogio, A. (1986). Manual de Técnicas en Histología Vegetal. Editorial Hemisferio Sur S.A. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 83 p.
Demarco, D., M. de Moraes C., and Ascensão, L. (2013). Two laticifer systems in Sapium haematospermum — new records for Euphorbiaceae. Botany 91: 545–554.
Dhillon, R., Hooda, M. Pundeer, J., Ahlawat, K. and Kumari, S. (2009). Development of effi-cient techniques for clonal multiplication of Jatropha curcas L., a potential biodiesel plant. Current Science. Vol. 96 (6): 823-827.
Díaz-López, L., Gimeno, V., Lindón, V., Simón, I., Martínez, V. and García-Sánchez, F. (2012). The tolerance of Jatropha curcas seedlings to NaCl: An ecophysiological analysis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. Vol. 54 (1): 34-42.
Hagel, J.M., Yeung, E.C., and Facchini, P.J. (2008). Got milk? The secret life of laticifers. Trends Plant Sci. 13: 631–639.
Hishida, M., Ascencio-Valle, F., Fujiyama, H., Endo, T., Orduño-Cruz, A. and Larrinaga-Mayoral, J. (2013). Response to salt stress in growth, water relations, and ion content of Jatropha curcas and Jatropha cinerea seedlings. Interciencia. Vol. 38 (4): 297-304.
Irigoyen, J. and Cruz, M. (2005). Guía Técnica de Semilleros y Viveros Frutales. IICA. Pri-mera edición. Santa Tecla, El Salvador. 39 p.
Martínez-Herrera, J., Siddhuraju, P., Francis, G., Dávila-Ortíz, G. and Becker, K. (2006). Chemical composition, toxic/antimetabolic constituents, and effects of different treatments on their levels, in four provenances of Jatropha curcas L. from Mexico. Food Chemistry. Vol. 96 (1): 80-89.
Martínez-Ballesta, M., Alcaraz-López, C., Muries, B., Mota-Cadenas, C. and Carvajal, M. (2010). Physiological aspects of rootstock–scion interactions. Scientia Horticulturae. 127. 112-118.
Pereira, I., Fachinello, J., Corrêa-Antunes, L., Diniz-Campos, Â. and Pina, A. (2014). In-compatibilidade de enxertia em Prunus. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, Vol. 44 (9): 1519-1526.
Poessel, J., Ermel, F. and Faurovert, M. (1996). Le point sur les bases physiologiques de la greffe vegetale. PHM Revue Horticole, 368:20-36.
Poulsen, K. and Stubsgaard, F. (2000). Tres Métodos de Escarificación Mecánica de Semillas de Testa Dura. En: CATIE (ed). Técnicas para la Escarificación de Semillas Forestales. Tur-rialba, Costa Rica. 60 p.
Quattrocchi, U. (2012). CRC World Dictionary of Medicinal and Poisonous Plants: Common names, Scientific names, Eponyms, Synonyms and Etymology. CRC Press. Volumen 5. Flo-rida, EUA. 3960 p.
Quiroz, F. (2013). Propagación in vitro de Jatropha curcas. In: Escoto, G., I. Contreras y M. Angulo (ed). Cadena AgroIndustrial de Jatropha curcas: Paquetes tecnológicos para el No-roeste de México. Publicia. Saarbrücken, Alemania. 338 p.
Rojas, S., García, J. and. Alarcón, M. (2004). Propagación Asexual de Plantas. Corpoica. Bo-gotá, Colombia. 57 p.
Seki, M., Umezewa, T., Urano, K. and Shinozaki, K. (2007). Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. Vol. 10 (3): 296-302.
Willan, R., L. (2000). Pre-tratamiento de Semillas. En: CATIE (ed). Técnicas para la germi-nación de semillas. Turrialba. Costa Rica. 57 p.
Yetman, D. and Van, T. (2002). Mayo Ethnobotany: Land, History and Traditional Knowledge in Northwest México. University of California Press. Los Angeles California, U.S.A. 372 p.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Nova Scientia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Conditions for the freedom of publication: the journal, due to its scientific nature, must not have political or institutional undertones to groups that are foreign to the original objective of the same, or its mission, so that there is no censorship derived from the rigorous ruling process.
Due to this, the contents of the articles will be the responsibility of the authors, and once published, the considerations made to the same will be sent to the authors so that they resolve any possible controversies regarding their work.
The complete or partial reproduction of the work is authorized as long as the source is cited.