Biogas potentiality production using pig manure in Guanajuato state

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v7i15.273

Keywords:

biogas, pig manure, alternative sources of energy, anaerobic biodigesters, energetic reform, electric energy, bovine cattle, pig cattle, energy saving, clean energies, biofuel, biomass

Abstract

The current energetic reform, as well as the world changes in the using and obtaining of electric and calorific energies, using alternative sources, has taken to replant and maximize the use and exploitation of biogas which is obtained from the manure of different types of cattle. The state of Guanajuato, owns an interesting number of cattle in the scope of bovine and pigs, which has originated the approach of the present article. In this work, it is presented a study in order to evaluate the energetic potentiality of the use of pig manures, to produce biogas and from that point to establish the electrical energy obtainable per year and the savings in the equivalent of oil barrels that could be obtained and the savings in gases like CO2. The study is made by dividing the state by municipalities and establishing the totals of every interest variable in the process. The indicators show that given the simplicity of biodigestors implementation to produce biogas, this is an interesting and important alternative to develop in the next years in the country. Particularly, the State of Guanajuato, have near of one million of pigs registered; with this quantity is possible to obtain potentially enough energy to supply the requirements of an approximate of 60,000 standard homes in México.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Miguel Martínez-Lozano, Universidad De La Salle Bajio

Dirección de Ingeniería Civil, Mecánica e Industrial.

Profesor

References

Antonio Colmenar-Santos, J.-L. B.-G.-D.-G. (2015). Hybridization of concentrated solar power plants with biogas production systems as an alternative to premiums: The case of Spain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 186–197.

Arias, L. A.; Chica, A.J.; Florez, O.D.; Becerra, M.A., (2012), UML for the design of the Biodigester automation . pp: 1 - 5. Transmission and Distribution: Latin America Conference and Exposition (T&D-LA), Sept 2012 Sixth IEEE/PES. Montevideo. Uruguay.

Campero, O., Kristinc, G., Cuppens, T., Mizme, P. (2008). Implementación del programa de mitigación de los efectos negativos del gas metano CH4, con la ejecución de acciones integrales de energías renovables y medio ambiente en el área rural de La Paz, Cochabamba y Santa Cruz.(Tecnologías en Desarrollo. 1-36.

Deutsches BiomasseForschungsZentrum (DBFZ), Monitoring zur Wirkung des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz (EEG) auf die Entwicklung der Stromerzeugung aus Biomasse“, Leipzig 2010, p.1. http://www.dbfz.de/web/fileadmin/user_upload/Userupload_Neu/3330002_Stromerzeugung_aus_Biomasse_3_Zwischenbericht_Kapitel_1-5_fuer_Veroeffentlichung_final.pdf (04.10.2014)

Ferran R, Jiménez E, González E, 2013. Aprovechamiento energético de biogás de depósito controlado mediante microturbinas y eliminación biológica de ácido sulfhídrico y siloxanos. [artículo en línea]. Revisado 11 de noviembre de 2014. Disponible en: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.showFile&rep=file&fil=LIFE05_ENV_E_000319_LAYMAN_ES.pdf

González J. (2010). Energías Renovables. México: Editorial Reverté

Infraestructura para granjas porcinas. Dirección web: http://razasporcinas.com/pigmarket/categoria-producto/desechos-y-efluentes/. Visitada: 08/11/2014.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) (2012). Anuario estadístico de Guanajuato 2012/Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, Gobierno del Estado de Guanajuato —México: INEGI, 2012.

INEGI, Información territorial, 2014. [en línea]. Revisado: 1 noviembre 2014. Disponible en: http://www.cuentame.inegi.org.mx/mapas/pdf/entidades/div_municipal/gtompios.pdf

Martínez C.C. Volumen de biodigestores. Energía y tú, (número 39), julio-septiembre de 2007 [en línea]. Revisado 14 de agosto de 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.cubasolar.cu/biblioteca/energia/Energia39/HTML/articulo04.htm.

Martínez-Lozano, M. (2015). Petróleo y gas vs Energías Renovables: Oportunidades y Complemento. LATAM Energy Convention, (págs. 1-15). Bogotá.

Pao HT, F. H. (2013). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and economic growth in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 382–391.

Red Mexicana de Bioenergía (2012). “Producción de Biogás en México. Estado Actual y Perspectivas”. Cuaderno Temático No 5, Diciembre 2012.

Samuel Nelson, M. I. (2013). Electric energymicro-production in a rural property using biogas. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 385–391.

S.J. Gerssen-Gondelach, e. a. (2014). Competing uses of biomass: Assessment and comparison of the performance of bio-based heat, power, fuels and materials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 964–998.

SENER. (2013). Prospectiva del Sector Eléctrico 2013-2027. Recuperado el 06 de 08 de 2015, de Secretaría de Energía: http://sener.gob.mx/res/PE_y_DT/pub/2013/Prospectiva_del_Sector_Electrico_2013-2027.pdf

Vera-Romero Iván, Estrada-Jaramillo Melitón, Martínez-Reyes José and Ortiz-Soriano Agustina, "Potencial de generación de biogás y energía eléctrica Parte I: excretas de ganado bovino y porcino", Ingeniería Investigación y Tecnología, volumen XV (número 3), julio-septiembre 2014: 429-436

Wolfgang S., B. Ralf (2011), Towards an Economy Based on Renewable Energy Generation: Is Biogas Part of the Solution?. UPEC 2011 ∙ 46th International Universities' Power Engineering Conference ∙ 5-8th September 2011 ∙ Soest ∙ Germany.

Published

2015-11-27

How to Cite

Martínez-Lozano, M. (2015). Biogas potentiality production using pig manure in Guanajuato state. Nova Scientia, 7(15), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v7i15.273

Issue

Section

Natural Sciences and Engineering

Metrics

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.